Eliakim Coulibaly vs Kirill Kivattsev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Examining the recent form over the last six months, Kivattsev holds an advantage in second serve performance, securing 49.36% of points, contrasting Coulibaly's 37.87%. There is a strong correlation between this statistic and match prediction accuracy, suggesting that Kivattsev may have a higher probability of success in this aspect of the game.

Analyzing return game statistics, Coulibaly exhibits a stronger performance when facing their opponent's second serve, winning 49.13% of those points compared to Kivattsev's 46.09%. In terms of first serve returns, Coulibaly also leads with 28.29%, surpassing Kivattsev's 24.28%. These stats are pivotal when assessing which player is favored in their head-to-head matchup.

Under pressure, Kivattsev demonstrates greater resilience with a 55.17% success rate in saving breakpoints, as opposed to Coulibaly's 46.3%. This is a valuable statistic for making in-game betting predictions, indicating Kivattsev's superior ability to handle critical moments.

In a performance overview spanning the past year, Coulibaly has a remarkable win rate of 71.23%, with a win/loss record of 52/21. In comparison, Kivattsev has won 55.56% of matches played, holding a 35/28 win/loss record. This overall head-to-head prediction overview favors Coulibaly when considering long-term performance.

Regarding surface preferences, Coulibaly's most successful surface is Hard, where they have achieved a 73% win rate (142/53), whereas their least favorable surface is Clay, with a 52% win rate (17/16). Kivattsev's best surface is Grass, boasting a 75% win rate (3/1), while their weakest performance is on Hard, where they win 54% of matches (56/48).

Comparing player levels, Coulibaly dominates in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80% of matches (36/9). Conversely, Kivattsev participates at a similar level but wins 60.78% of matches (31/20). Such statistics are crucial when predicting the favorite, considering the relative event level they compete at.

Assessing the quality of opponents, over the past year, Coulibaly has encountered players with an average rank of 424.93, whereas Kivattsev has faced competitors with an average rank of 478.03, favoring Coulibaly in terms of competing against higher-ranked adversaries.

Deciding set performance indicates that Coulibaly has an edge, winning 64% of deciding sets over the last twelve months, compared to Kivattsev's 53% success rate. In scenarios of live predictions and betting, this could prove decisive if the match extends to a deciding set.

Recent form in breakpoint conversion puts Coulibaly ahead, successfully converting 35.29% of opportunities, whereas Kivattsev achieves 24.32%. This statistic can provide significant insight for in-game live betting strategies when either player is presented with a breakpoint chance.

In conclusion, while both players have demonstrated sufficient skill and resilience, Coulibaly's consistent performance across various metrics, stronger recent form, and ability to convert key opportunities tilt the prediction in their favor for an eventual victory in the upcoming match.